tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8437901534161780164.post6313595607440044764..comments2024-03-26T03:06:15.580-04:00Comments on Dog Law Reporter: Canine Domestication May Have Begun 30,000 or More Years AgoJohn Ensmingerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02840129911400528572noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8437901534161780164.post-41487009826799749902018-11-28T12:43:59.159-05:002018-11-28T12:43:59.159-05:00I amend this comment because although it is more o...I amend this comment because although it is more or less correct it has nothing to do with whether or not the drawing is a dog or wolf. It is actually required that we assume this is a dog unless proven otherwise because wolves had no place in human society during the millennia given as to when the drawing was accomplished. As we all know grey wolves avoid humans when possible so from the artists perspective they are no more important than any other animal which was not included in any cave drawing. Dogs, or at least proto dogs, on the other hand were important to humans which would give reason for an artist to<br />include them in cave art.<br />Hardzdiamondhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05719818606355187451noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8437901534161780164.post-35909257553523401062013-02-01T21:21:18.122-05:002013-02-01T21:21:18.122-05:00The dog in the first picture of this blog may not ...The dog in the first picture of this blog may not be a dog! As the tag suggests, it may be a wolf because this is actually a drawing of a cave drawing done by a monk who may or may not have edited the original and the original is now hardly visible as any more than a stick figure. It is just one example of what researchers face when analyzing prehistoric evidence. Hardzdiamondhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05719818606355187451noreply@blogger.com